Blogtree. A Safe Haven in a Chaotic Industry.


MasterCard interchange changes for Utility, Real Estate and Insurance merchants

Posted on Wednesday, October 15, 2008 by Bryan Johnson

master cardMasterCard announced some changes to their interchange pricing today that will be effective October 3, 2008. 

As some quick context if you are new to this. Here is an oversimplification: merchants pay fees to accept credit cards. Financial institutions that issue credit and debit cards make roughly 75% of the fees that merchants pay (merchant account providers charge the other 25% of the fees). When MasterCard makes changes to 'Interchange', they are adjusting the wholesale pricing of the fees that make up MasterCard and their financial issuing institution's 75% of fees. To the casual observer in this industry - these updates below won't make a lot of sense without some additional context.

Utilities

  • Merchants no longer need to register for their Utility Program
  • MC is discontinuing their Service Industries Incentive Program (SIIP). The SIIP program offered a lower discount rate and transaction fee. Utilities will now be charged a fixed fee per transaction which is lower on average than rates paid on SIIP and closer to pin debit rates.

Real Estate

  • Discontinuing two Debit interchange categories (Merit III and UCAF), otherwise pricing stays the same. 

Insurance

  • Similar to utilities, discontinuing the discounted SIIP rates. Merit III, Merit I Merchant/Full UCAF Debit are no longer eligible.

Telecommunications

  • Similiar to utilities and insurance, discontinuing the discounted SIIP rates but Merit III, Merit I Merchant/Full UCAF Debit are still eligible.

Related Posts
Where do credit card fees come from?

Comments: 0 | Post a Comment

California Data Breach Law Vetoed - Again

Posted on Friday, October 03, 2008 by Bryan Johnson

Computer World reports the following today:

For the second time in 12 months, California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has vetoed proposed legislation that would have required retailers and other businesses operating in the state to take specific steps to prevent credit and debit card data from being compromised.

The latest version of the bill — known as the Consumer Data Protection Act, or AB 1656 (download PDF) — would also have required retailers that accept payment card transactions to disclose more details about any data breaches to the individuals affected by them. The bill was approved by the California State Assembly on a 74-1 vote last month, a week after the state Senate passed it by a 34-3 margin.

But in a veto message that he sent to state legislators on Tuesday (download PDF), Schwarzenegger said he was refusing to sign the bill for the same reasons he turned down the original version of the measure last October. "As I stated in last year's veto of a similar bill, this bill attempts to legislate in an area where the marketplace has already assigned responsibilities and liabilities that provide for the protection of consumers," Schwarzenegger wrote.

The governor said that requiring companies to notify consumers about breaches, even when there is no evidence of any personal data actually being stolen, would result in "significant costs" for businesses and the state government. In addition, he said, the controls mandated in AB 1656 would lock companies into current credit card data security best practices, creating a disincentive for them to adopt new and more comprehensive industry standards and ensuring that the law would remain "static in the face of future, unseen concerns."

Seems like practical, good decision making to me. Nice work Schwarzenegger.

Comments: 0 | Post a Comment

Subscribe via email


Subscribe via RSS

Search

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.